Principle / Ruledraft· Frawley — Astrology of the Seers
The chakra-correspondence element-rulership differs from the usual order
rul-chakra-element-rulership-differsPrāṇa relevance
The very point of the divergence is that the subtle (chakra) level reshuffles element-rulership relative to the gross/usual level — which is why this chapter's chakra↔element associations should NOT be silently merged with the Medical theme's gross Air/Fire/Water humor scheme. The discrepancy is itself prana-relevant data (gross vs subtle element ordering). Flagged as a question.
Sources
- txt-frawley-astrology-seersChakras and the Houses, closing NOTE (book p.234)Modern✓ verifiedthe chakra correspondences differ from the usual order, particularly element-rulership, because working on a more subtle level
Other attributes
- Rule Class
- doctrine
- Statement
- Frawley's closing caveat: 'This set of correspondences according to the chakras differs slightly from the usual order, particularly in regard to rulership of the elements. This is because it is working on a more subtle level.' I.e. the chakra-based planet/sign/house correspondences he gives here are NOT identical to the ordinary astrological correspondences, and the element-rulership in particular diverges — flagged by the author himself.
- Tag
- MODERN
- School Positions
- [{"school":"Frawley's chakra-subtle scheme","position":"a chakra-based set of element/planet/sign correspondences that 'differs slightly from the usual order', especially element-rulership; works on a 'more subtle level'","source":"Frawley book p.234","tag":"MODERN"},{"school":"the 'usual order' (standard astrological/tantric element-rulership)","position":"the ordinary element-to-sign and element-to-chakra rulerships from which Frawley's set deviates (he does not spell it out)","source":"Frawley book p.234 (referenced, not tabulated)","tag":"MODERN"}]